EPA Demands Terrorism Be Evaluated At Indian Point

Monday, October 29, 2007

US EPA Calls For Evaluation of Environmental Costs of Terrorist Attack

Just in over the AP, the US EPA agrees with FUSE USA that the environmental costs of a successful terrorist attack on Indian Point must be included in the SEIS. The EPA's position runs contrary to the NRC's wrongful attempts to eliminate same from any consideration in the EIS process.

NRC egregiously takes the position that Security for the plant needs to be dealt with on a ongoing, ever changing basis...we agree with that premise, but point out that Security in and of itself has nothing to do with evaluating the environmental costs should a successful terrorist attack occur. NRC chooses to ignore this very simple fact, and in ignoring this basic tenant of an Environmental Impact Study for Indian Point, they are failing to abide by the NEPA rules to evaluate all environmental impacts, no matter how GREAT, or how small.

Further, the AP story brings out another IMPORTANT ISSUE that FUSE USA has brought to the attention of the NRC. Entergy's application for a License Renewal, is not and amendment to extend their CURRENT OPERATING LICENSE, but in fact a application for a NEW LICENSE for the two facilities. Based on this simple fact, all EIS siting criteria issues should be included within the scope of the SEIS. The NRC is of the belief that the Current License Basis is sufficient to justify a GEIS (Generic Environmental Impact Statement) for almost all site specific issues. That belief will be challenged in the License Renewal Process for Indian Point.

In order for NRC to proceed toward that goal they required the resolution of legal issues regarding extensions. In January of 1989, NRC’s General Counsel issued his opinions regarding these issues, namely that the extension be accomplished via a new license rather than an amendment of the current license and that an environmental assessment would be required with either a finding of no significant impact’ or an environmental impact statement. Office of General Counsel (OGC) stated that based upon their review of case law and regulations, an antitrust review would not be required. NRC staff reached certain conclusions based upon OGC’s input and the opinions offered by other interested groups, among these, that the current licensing basis would “provide reasonable assurance of adequate protection” of the public. They determined that NRC should draft a generic environmental impact statement to be used in all renewal cases.

FUSE USA points out a glaring error in the AP story. Several news sources are reporting that the city of New York has filed a Petition to Intervene in the License Renewal hearings.

Various groups have filed lawsuits demanding hearings on the scope of the relicensing. New York City, just 30 miles south of the reactors in Buchanan, has formally requested _ without taking a position _ that it be allowed a voice in the decision.

This is what the New York Economic Development Corporation would LIKE EVERYONE TO BELIEVE. However, when said corporation was pushed on this matter in a phone conversation last week, they RELUCTANTLY admitted they are not a part of New York government, but wanted to defend their inclusion in the License Renewal process. Fact is, said corporation works closely with Mayor Bloomberg's office, but IS NOT IN ANY WAY LEGALLY A PART OF New York City government, and thus HAS NO STANDING. Much like NY AREA who is also trying to intervene, NY Economic Development Corporation is a Pro-Business, pro nuclear energy group wrongfully trying to elbow their way into the process. The NRC cannot allow Entergy, NEI and the nuclear industry to send wolves into the hen house dressed as sheep. NY AREA was originally started and funded with Entergy DOLLARS, and should have ZERO standing in the License Renewal process.

Nuclear Terrorism: Vulnerabilities & Solutions

Understanding the Nuclear Propaganda Machine's Tactics

As NEI (Nuclear Energy Institute), the NRC and the nuclear Industry try to bring us the sequal to the Friendly Atom, they are using many of the same tactics to corrupt the minds of our children in the name of a Nuclear Renaissance that were used some 50 years ago. Infiltrate classrooms, and put toys into the market place that present the atom in a friendly light. Problem is, if you go back and look at some of those old toys and presentations, you suddenly realize just how perverse the nuclear industry was then, and how perverse they are today. This is the first of numerous posts that will be launched to share these old propaganda relics used to pervert our children's minds...the NRC, and the nuclear industry must not be allowed to perpetuate the same crimes a second time. Did your parents buy you this Atomic Energy Lab? Were you a part of some perverted National Propaganda Campaign visited upon the innocent children of the 50's and 60's? Talk about MIND CONTROL.

As NRC LOWERS Fire Safety Standards, Dante's Inferno Races Towards California Reactor

The Nuclear Industry is holding their collective breath today as their worst nightmare, a reactor fire looms close on the horizon as California's Towering Inferno wildfires and their scorched earth flames consume everything in sight. Reports on the news wire say they are at least three days from bringing the fires under control, and right now said fires are burning OUT OF CONTROL a scant seven miles from the San Onofre Nuclear Reactor. Here is the story as reported on Green Nuclear Butterfly

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Dantes Inferno Rushs Toward San Onofre Nuclear Plant

As out of control fires blanket Southern California in a living hell, the citizens of America have a much larger problem they need to be worrying about. The towering inferno that is torching hundreds of homes is now less than seven miles from the San Onofre Nuclear Plant. There should be a collectively GASP as that shoe drops.

Telescope,
nuclear plant threatened

Mount Palomar, San Onofre:

Fire officials at the command center in Riverside said the Mt. Palomar fire has exploded to 20,000 acres and could threaten the famed observatory at the top, which houses one of the world's largest telescopes. They also said two fires have broken out in Camp Pendleton, the Wilcox Fire at 1,200 acres and the Ammo Fire at 350 acres. The Ammo fire has raised concerns because it is at the base of San Onofre Peak and climbing up toward an array of telecommunications equipment. The San Onofre nuclear power plant is on the other side. Chief of Operations Chief Bob Green said the governor asked him to send in air tankers to lay down water between the fire and the communications equipment.

David
Kelly

Odd that we are facing what could be a catastrophic NUCLEAR FIRE just as the NRC is attempting to LOWER SAFETY MARGINS for America's aging fleet of 104 nuclear reactors. Par for the course, the NRC is trying to put a positive spin on the situation by claiming there are no immediate risks to human health and the environment. Maybe a major news network needs to ask the NRC what the risks are going to be IF THE FIRE REACHES the reactor?

Refuting Christine Todd Whitman's Nuclear Lies

Nuclear money whore, and washed up has been politician Christine Todd Whitman who is now selling her services to the Nuclear Industry as the co-founder of NEI funded CASEnergy is out in the media spreading nuclear lies and propaganda...she launched her latest diatribe early this morning, and Nuclear Jesus found her vile filth over on the Nuke Worker site. We thought we would correct some of her bolder falsehoods here on Nuclear Jesus.

This slithering demon spawn claims in her latest drivel that Nuclear energy is clean. Claims it is the world's largest source of emission-free energy. Claims nuclear energy produces no nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases. First, Nuclear Energy is NOT CLEAN. Just use Indian Point as one example. Said aging reactor site is leaking strontium 90, tritium and cesium 137 into the groundwater and the Hudson River which runs along the trouble plagued site. Additionally, nuclear is far from being EMISSIONS free, and this lying tart knows it. Lastly, if you look at the ENTIRE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE, it produces massive amounts of a host of environmental contaminants, including some of the most deadly known to mankind, and is further not a CO2 free energy source. The woman speaks with a FORKED TONGUE.

This nuclear harlot then goes on to claim that the nuclear industry accounts for all of its waste streams. Again, for convenience sake we'll use Indian Point. Right now, the site is being investigated for Tritium leaks. The licensee (Entergy) does not even know exactly where the leaks are located on the site, and therefore cannot ascertain with certainty how much radiological contamination has taken place. Further, if you get the chance, ask Christine Todd Whitman how many spent fuel rods have been removed from Commercial Reactors here in America, and stored in a licensed off site long term disposal/storage facility? Ask her about the COLLAPSING COOLING TOWERS at Vermont Yankee, or the TEPCO reactors that were wrongfully built on a Earthquake Fault, just as Indian Point was.

Not to worry, she'll assure you that all spent nuclear fuel is SAFELY stored in dry cask storage...these containers are approved for a period of 20 years. Further, ask her is she would care to discuss all the spent fuel rods in the leaking SPENT FUEL POOLS at Indian Point.

She moves on to talk about GNEP, and the reprocessing of these spent fuel rods...do yourselves a favor, and ask her if the proposed new generation of reactors (AP1000) are capable of using this fuel even if it is produced? More importantly, ask her about the FACT that GNEP basically assures that almost all of the world's NUCLEAR WASTE is going to end up RIGHT HERE IN AMERICA.

She babbles on about YUCCA as a safe place to store nuclear by products, showing her ignorance of recent studies showing the site to be UNACCEPTABLE for use...not to mention the fact that DOE is trying to build the site in sacred native Indian lands.

Her next major lie talks about defense in depth protection at nuclear plants. We will not discuss the piece of crap DBT for nuclear plants right now, but instead focus in on the NRC's attempts to greatly reduce SAFETY MARGINS for America's aging fleet of PWR reactor internals as relates to Thermal Shock...you see, they want to lower those standards for a simple reason. NONE of the PWR reactors can meet the current standards during their period of license renewal! So, rather than deny these trouble plagued reactors a license renewal, the NRC because of pressure from the nuclear industry wants to simply LOWER SAFETY STANDARDS.

HER BIGGEST LIE....nuclear is CHEAP. GNEP comes with a price tag of around $500 BILLION TAX DOLLARS. In the next two years alone, the nuclear industry wants $50 Billion in loan guarantees. The Price Anderson Act eliminates financial liability on the industry in the case of a significant accident (think Chernobyl), which means American property owners WILL LOSE EVERYTHING when the major accident occurs. So, nuclear energy is not cheap, and cannot exist without significant public financial help and sacrifice. As and American, are you willing to lose your home so that the nuclear industry can build a plant in your neighborhood? Are you willing to risk your child's health, expose them to ELEVATED cancer rates so that companies like Entergy can increase their corporate profits?

The sniveling washed up snit can spew her nuclear lies all she wants, but that does not make them true. Ask her how much she is PAID to spout nuclear propaganda to the masses, ask her how much of CASEnergy's funding is coming from the nuclear industry before you buy into her lies.

NRC and Entergy Trying To Play Grinch

Just in from the Green Nuclear Butterfly...seems the NRC has jumped the gun a bit, and gone ahead with forming a three judge panel ahead of the November 30th deadline for filing contentions in opposition to the license renewal of Entergy's Indian Point.

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Sunday, October 21, 2007

NRC Names Three Judge Panel For Indian Point Application
Seems that the NRC is trying to get a jump on the judicial process related to Entergy's fatally flawed application for license renewal of the Indian Point reactors. In short, those of us seeking to intervene in the process should be prepared for some dirty tricks including a massive number of Entergy Christmas season attempts to get our contentions tossed out. We need a picture of the Grinch holding and Entergy sign.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board established for Indian Point license renewal

Washington -- A three-judge board has been established to review requests for a hearing on the license renewal application for the Indian Point nuclear power plant in Buchanan. Should a hearing regarding the application take place, the board would also conduct that proceeding.

The board is drawn from the Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel, which is a judicial component of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission tasked with conducting all licensing and other hearings as directed by the presidentially appointed commission that oversees the NRC.

The ASLBP operates independently of the NRC technical staff. The judges named by ASLBP Chief Administrative Judge E. Roy Hawkens to preside over the Indian Point proceeding are Lawrence McDade, who will serve as chairman; Dr. Richard Wardwell; and Dr. Kaye Lathrop.

Most boards are composed of one judge who is qualified in conducting administrative proceedings, who is a lawyer, and two judges who have technical qualifications appropriate to the issues in the proceedings, who are scientists or engineers.

Under NRC regulations, the original operating license for a nuclear power plant has a term of 40 years. The license may be renewed for up to an additional 20 years if NRC requirements are met. The current operating licenses for Indian Point Units 2 and 3 expire, respectively, on Sept. 28, 2013, and Dec. 12, 2015.

Nuclear Accident We Lose Everything, But New Build Reactors Get INSURANCE

Thanks to greed, and special interest lobbying, citizens in reactor host communities are left to hold the bag if there is a nuclear accident. Thanks to the United States Congress and Senate and the Price Anderson Act, we cannot insure our homes for nuclear accidents or a terrorist act on a Nuclear Reactor. Meanwhile, if some host community OPPOSED a New Build Reactor in their neighborhood, seems our government has decided that Nuclear Companies should be insured for such UNFORTUNATE DELAYS!

Now, this is no small time insurance policy either...be one of the first two reactors in line to build a new generation of nuclear reactors, and the DOE is going to guarantee your company $500 million in insurance to offset any costs due to delay from things like LAWSUITS, and that policy is thanks TO OUR TAX DOLLARS...this is on top of the $50 BILLION in loan guarantees that groups like MUSE are now trying to stop.

US government agrees new build insurance
27 September 2007



Companies building new nuclear power plants in the USA can now qualify for a share of $2 billion in federal risk insurance, under a Conditional Agreement released by the Department of Energy (DOE).

The insurance covers costs associated with certain regulatory or litigation-related delays that, through no fault of the company, can delay plant start-up. According to the DOE, the risk insurance, authorized under the Energy Policy Act of 2005, "provides incentive and stability in spurring construction of new nuclear power plants and meeting our energy needs in a clean, safe, economical manner."

Energy Secretary Samuel W Bodman, announcing the agreement, noted: "Conditional Agreements pave the way for risk insurance contracts that will provide the first project sponsors constructing new nuclear power plants with assistance if they face delays in expanding the use of nuclear energy across the nation."

The coverage of the government-backed risk insurance would include delays associated with regulatory reviews of inspections, tests, analyses and acceptance criteria, as well as certain delays associated with pre-operational hearings or litigation in federal, state or tribal courts. Normal business risks, such as employment strikes and weather delays, would not be covered.

Under the Energy Policy Act, the DOE is authorized to enter contracts to provide risk insurance with the first six sponsors to begin construction of new nuclear facilities and that meet all other contractual conditions. Coverage of up to $500 million will be available to the first two plants which begin construction, with up to $250 million for the next four. Application for coverage is a two-step process, with sponsors required to enter a Conditional Agreement first and then, if eligible, a risk insurance contract. The Conditional Agreement is available to any sponsor of an advanced nuclear facility once its application for a Construction and Operating Licence (COL) is docketed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). However, only the first six that are issued a COL and begin construction will be eligible for the risk insurance contract with DOE.

Water-the Ugly Truth Nuclear Does Not Want You To Look At

Death On The Horizon-Diablo Canyon Reactors

Watching CNN this morning, seems that Atlanta is all but OUT OF WATER, forced conservation enforced with $1,000 fines if you want your water back on immediately. What does that fact have to do with Nuclear Energy...perhaps, everything. Nuclear reactors, and electric production in general are the largest users of water in America right behind agriculture. In years to come conservation and protection of limited water resources is the most important issue facing our nation, our world. Nuclear plants and the electric industry must be reigned in, their water usage and raping of the environment stopped if we are going to address Global Warming, and reverse the melting of the global ice caps.

The first thing that has to be done, is every nuclear power plant has to be converted too a Closed Cooling System. Indian Point as a part of its original operating license was supposed to convert to a Closed Cooling system by 1979. Twenty-Eight years later the community around the plant is still waiting while Entergy and the NRC drag their feet, or simply ignore the issue. To understand this, to put the importance of Closed verse once through cooling of a nuclear reactor, we look at one statistic. A closed cooling system reactor is going to use close to 100 million gallons of water each and every day. Indian Point's two once through reactors use up 2.4 Billion gallons a day! Do the math for 28 years, and Indian Point by refusing to install a closed cooling system has WRONGFULLY used 28.5 trillion gallons of extra water. Think about that cold stark FACT...a trillion gallons of water is wrongfully going through Indian Point each and every year they are in operation.

Some will say, "What's the big deal?"

There are several big deals, and the biggest one is Nuclear's Thermal Discharge contributions to Global Warming. At Indian Point, that 2.4 Billion gallons of water sucked into the plant is viciously and turbulently thrown back into the Hudson River at 103-105 degrees in temperature. Ask yourselves why the NRC, and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) don't ever talk about Thermal Discharge contributions to Global Water...could it be one of those Inconvenient Truths that Al Gore keeps talking about? It does not take a significant rise in global temperatures to drastically affect global climate.

Further, the nuclear industry would have people believe that Nuclear Electric is pollution free. Not even close, and some of the industry's pollution streams are the most deadly known to mankind. Strontium, Tritium, Cesium and assorted daughter chains are contributing to elevated cancer rates in communities being forced to play host to these environmental monsters. The Nuclear Party Line...we are within allowable release criteria. Problem is, every time they cannot meet those criteria, the NRC grants a given licensee and exemption to the rules and regulations meant to protect human health and safety.

Another subject that the Nuclear Industry wants us all to ignore, is the industry's fish kills, numbering into the millions for each plant up and operating. Think about this for a moment...the National Geographic did an article some time ago wherein it was stated that 90 percent of the world's fish supplies have been fished out. If fish eggs and larvae are being killed because of impingement, thermal shock and other causes associated with the nuclear industry, those fish and larvae never grow up to replenish the world's rivers and oceans...so, not only is Nuclear Energy a major contributing source to Global Warming, but it is negatively impacting our ability to FEED THE WORLD.

Lastly, and this is germane to every electric utility in America...utility easement maintenance needlessly destroys over 100,000 mature trees each and every year because the industry refuses to employ updated technology and infrastructure improvements to eliminate 90 percent of this tree loss. This statistic is far more staggering when you realize that the utility industry does not consider a tree a tree unless it has a diameter four foot about the ground of at least six inches. Smaller than that, and no inventory is kept, the destruction written off as scrub. Trees are Mother Earth's scrubbers, help in COOLING the planet. It is time that we demand a change in electric industry standards world wide to stop this needless destruction.

The Inconvenient Truth is simple...Global Warming cannot be changed without major societal shifts in how we live our lives, without a paradigm shift in how corporations are allowed to do business. Nuclear is not GREEN, and is not the answer to Global Warming. When you look at the entire nuclear fuel cycle, factor in the nuclear industries CO2 contributions from mining through to long term disposal and storage of radioactive wastes, and you have a DESTRUCTIVE INDUSTRY that visits death every where it is.

Has Department Of Homeland Security Prepared You For Terrorist Attack On Indian Point?

Are you, your family and your loved ones prepared for a significant off site radiological event, or worse a terrorist attack on Entergy's Indian Point? We have all seen the Peek Fatality map, have bought our rolls of duct tape and sheets of plastic. However, is it enough, are you prepared to survive the FALL OUT from a significant MALFUNCTION at Indian Point?

Civil Defense Bulletin Number 1-Introduction to A Nuclear Event

Do Your Homework-Nuclear Is Hitler Ugly

We have vile sinister monsters lying to the public, claiming nuclear is safe, boosting that no one has ever been killed for Nuclear Energy. They lie, and people around America are dying every day for Nuclear Power, being stricken with horrible cancers in the name of clean green energy. Americans need to study the history of the Nuclear Military/Commercial Fuel Cycle so that they know the ugly truth. We need to END the nuclear fuel cycle, not perpetuate it.

Human Radiation Experiments in the United States

By Arjun Makhijani and Ellen Kennedy

Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and
misguided man.

Martin Luther King, Jr., 1963

Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary announced on December 7, 1993 that the nuclear establishment had conducted radiation experiments on humans since the 1940s. It was a stunning admission - the first time that the head of a nuclear weapons agency had stood before the people it was pledged to protect to admit the awful truth that it had experimented on them. "The only thing I could think of was Nazi Germany," she told Newsweek.² Similar thoughts undoubtedly crossed the minds of millions, who wondered how the citizens of a country with democratic checks and balances could have been used as unwitting guinea pigs.

It was soon apparent that other agencies, beyond the Department of Energy, had been involved in human radiation experiments.³ For example, the Department of Defense deliberately released radionuclides into the air from 1948 to 1952 in order to design and test radiation weapons.⁴ Such weapons, discussed as far back as the Manhattan Project, are designed to create temporarily high radiation fields to kill or debilitate enemy soldiers. Secretary O'Leary, in effect, opened a Pandora's box of U.S. radiation testing on humans.

Purposes of the Experiments

The accompanying table on pages 4 and 5 shows a list of many of the human radiation experiments categorized according to the five goals of the funding agencies. Some experiments may have had more than one purpose; for example, some involving external exposure to sick people were purportedly to treat cancers. The objectives of the experiments will not be entirely known until we have more documentation.

Nameless Subjects

This is not a new story, despite the impression that recent, intense media coverage conveys. In 1986, Congressman Edward Markey of Massachusetts released a report called "American Nuclear Guinea Pigs," documenting many of the radiation experiments on U.S. citizens and calling for further investigation.⁵ Yet at the time, the Department of Energy denied that anything unethical had been done, and the report went largely unnoticed.

There are several reasons why the experiments have generated a public outcry in 1993-94 and did not in 1986. First, the Department of Energy is slowly trying to redefine itself according to post Cold War reality, thanks in large part to Secretary O'Leary. Second, the 1986 Markey report released information about nameless human subjects. It took a reporter from the Albuquerque Tribune - Eileen Welsome - uncovering the identities of some of the subjects for the public to listen. Somehow the thought of "Cal-3" being injected with plutonium was less offensive to the public than "Elmer Allen," a down-on-his-luck railroad porter being injected in his injured leg, in which he was told he had bone cancer; his leg was then amputated.

Get Your Child's Teeth Checked for Strontium!

Some old news is worth repeating. If you live near a nuclear reactor and have small children it might be a very good idea to have your childrens teeth checked.

WATERFORD, Conn. -- A controversial study collecting children's baby teeth could shed light on rising cancer rates.

Channel 3 Eyewitness News reporter Kara Sundlun recently spoke with model and activist Christie Brinkley, who has urged Connecticut officials to support the Tooth Fairy Project.

The researchers examine baby teeth and they claim the teeth show children absorb radiation from nuclear power plants that can lead to cancer.

Brinkley and the scientists behind the program deem the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Waterford dangerous.

Read Rest of Story

Is The Nuclear Industry Brain Washing Your Children?

In the beginning, America brought you the "Friendly Atom" and convinced economically depressed communities that having a nuclear reactor in their back yard was a good thing...we now know it was not, but the nuclear industry, NEI, DOE and the NRC are ready to build a whole new generation of reactors. The goal is simple, build 220 new reactors in America by 2050.

Problem is, they have to convince us it's the thing to do! Think about it, by the time they accomplish their goal, a child born in 2007 will be 43. So, now is the time to Brain Wash (whoops...educate) those who will follow in our footsteps, make them believe today that Nuclear Energy is Green tomorrow. The right propaganda campaign, and NEI buys the nuclear industry two, maybe three generations of complacent Pro Nuclear lambs ready to be led to slaughter.

Do you know what sights your children visit on the Internet...is there another predator cruising the web in the hopes of corrupting young minds? Take a look at a few of the Nuclear Children's Propaganda sites, and ask yourself who is actually paying for this Brain Washing with our taxes and utility rates.

DOE Kid's Page

http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/energyfacts/sources/non-renewable/nuclear.html

TVA Kids Nuclear Power

http://www.tvakids.com/electricity/nuclear.htm

Resources for Kids

NEI Science Club
http://www.nei.org/scienceclub

Energy Information Administration Kids' Page
http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids

National Energy Technology Laboratory's "Cool Science"
http://www.netl.doe.gov/coolscience

The Nuclear Energy Indigo Kids...Listen To Your Children

Have to love it when our children see through the lies and propaganda put out by the nuclear industry, and take it upon themselves to put out their own SPOOF on the industry. This great little piece was found through Google.

Just in case the video will not play:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8115123302331901833

50 Years Later, Same Tired Emergency Plan Will Not Work

The more life changes, the more it stays the same...especially when it comes to corporate monsters and politicians lying to you in the hopes you will believe. The Civil Defense Film on what to do in the case of a nuclear incident from the 1950's is eerily similar to Indian Point's non working Emergency Plan of 2007. The plan would not protect citizens then, and Entergy's plan will not protect us to day.

We as a county here in Westchester, New York and as a nation can ignore the sinister truth of the Friendly Atom, or we can rise up as a community and take back our public safety by EVICTING Indian Point's evil tenant (Entergy) and forcing the NRC to decommission the site. The choice is yours, and the lives that could be lost in a nuclear incident or terrorist attack at the facility could be those of your loved ones, those of your children, your grand children. Ask yourselves, are you willing to bet your life on Entergy's claim that Indian Point is safe? Will you bet your children's lives on their propaganda?

Nuclear-Destroyer of Worlds

Perhaps no one has spoken more truth about Nuclear than Robert Oppenheimer after the first explosion of a Nuclear Bomb. Mother Earth does not need a Nuclear Renaissance but instead needs to find ways to put this murderous genie back in the bottle, and clean up the radioactive waste from over 50's years of a fools folly.


via videosift.com

Why Sheltering In Place Will Not Work

Any one living close to a nuclear reactor, such as Entergy's Vermont Yankee or Indian Point knows that the evacuation plans will not work. More importantly, NEI, the NRC, Entergy and even Homeland Security know these evacuation plans will not work. That is why they are trying to feed the masses a new form of propaganda, are doing their best to convince us that we can safely SHELTER IN PLACE in our basements with a roll of duct tape and a few sheets of plastic.

As Mr. Natural was fond of saying, "My advice to you is plain and to the point, get the hell out of town!"

Forget the blast, it's the invisible radioactive ghoul floating on the air after a significant nuclear accident or terrorist attack of a nuclear reactor that will kill you, give you cancer, cause birth defects for generations to come.



via videosift.com

Why PETA Needs To Join The Fight To Close Indian Point

To atone for one's sins, one first must know those sins. The supposed "Friendly Atom" has never been friendly, and from the inception of the nuclear age, the industry has thought nothing of killing innocents in their quest of an evil and sinister dream. Today, in 2007 67 American communities are real time nuclear experiments as the NRC and DOE allow the nuclear industry to count our mounting deaths, tabulate the number of our children poisoned with cancer causing radiological contaminants. The only different between today's experiments conducted in the name of National Security, and those of 60 years ago, is back then a lot more animals were sacrificed in Satan's Nuclear Temple. The time has come for America to know the truth, to know that Nuclear Energy is not Green, nor is it safe. Where is PETA in this fight...are not America's children just as worthy of their efforts as the other animals in God's Kingdom?


via videosift.com

Nuclear Industry's Early Propaganda Targeting Our Children

Sadly, much like sexual deviants, pedophiles of the worst kind, members of our own government, executives within the Nuclear Industry targeted our society's most vulnerable...our children. They wanted to bastardize the truth, sell America on the Friendly Atom, and to accomplish their evil plan, they targeted America's CHILDREN.

Back some 50 years ago, thinking their children were safe, parents sent them off to schools around America assuming they would be protected from predators. Instead, insidous monsters of Corporate America, nuclear energy executives like today's online sexual predators went out of their way to target our children, befriend them, warp and twist their thinking by infiltrating classrooms all across the nation. The nuclear propaganda machine is still preying on our children today as NEI attempts to sell America on the concept of a Nuclear Renaissance, but viewing one of the early nuclear propaganda pieces starring the voice of John Sutherland, we see not much has changed in 50 years.


via videosift.com

Welcome To The Church of Nuclear Jesus

So, Satan and his demon spawn want the world to embrace a Nuclear Renaissance, want the world to embrace the building of over 220 new reactors by the year 2050...ask yourselves, what would Jesus Do? The people of earth were given free will, and with that gift came great responsibility. You have been charged with being good stewards of Mother Earth, and all of God's creatures.

The hounds of hell are out to rule the world, want to visit death and destruction upon the earth, and my people, my sheep have seen with their own eyes the horrid truth that is nuclear. Hiroshima, and the dropping of THE BOMB showed the world the awesomely destructive power of the atom, but mankind refused to walk away. Those with evil intents and vile hearts preached the virtues of the "Friendly Atom" and promised the world energy so cheap it would not even have to be metered.

Speak to Nuclear Jesus about safe, vital and secure Green Energy in the form of nuclear, and I will preach to you about Chernobyl and the suffering of my children huddled under the altar of Corporate Greed and National Interests.

Join the Nuclear Energy Indigo kids (NEI Kids) as we look at the evils of Nuclear Energy, and ask ourselves, "What Would Nuclear Jesus Do?"